The small size of some stone-age arrow heads from Denmark suggest they were used together with poisons....Read More
See the maps and charts that show how America voted in the US midterm elections....Read More
A shooting at an Iowa post office left multiple people injured Thursday, authorities said....Read More
DOJ says it was stoking "hate," not fighting it. The post Is the SPLC a Criminal Enterprise? appeared first on American Renaissance. ...Read More
Two people are OK after a seaplane partially submerged following an aborted takeoff from a lake in Oakland County....Read More
Five of France's unions join a wave of strikes and protests in a national day of action....Read More
Beginning Thursday night, visitors to Crawlspace Comedy Theatre in downtown Kalamazoo can attend the annual Kalamazoo Improv Festival, featuring more than 20 Midwest live comedy acts and improv teams....Read More
Ancient coins suggest a forgotten queen helped change British history, but not everyone is convinced....Read More
Demolition could get underway soon on the old Navy and Marine Corps Reserve Center in Grand Rapids....Read More
From dramatic lightning strikes to foreboding storm clouds, these stunning photographs capture the beauty, power and unpredictability of our planet's weather. ...Read More
...Read More
General Motors has agreed to pay $220 million to settle allegations that it collected and sold customers' driving information without their knowledge or consent. But the drivers whose information was allegedly sold — some of whom saw their insurance premiums increase — won't receive a dime.The October 29 settlement resolves allegations brought by attorneys general from 36 states and jurisdictions. The money goes to those states, not directly to affected drivers. GM must also comply with new privacy requirements, including obtaining express consent before collecting or sharing driving data.Beginning in December 2022, GM also provided Wejo with radio-listening data, including ignition timestamps, AM/FM frequencies, station call signs, time zones, and radio genres.That leaves an important question: How much money did GM make selling information its customers generated simply by driving their cars?The information came largely through GM's OnStar Smart Driver program, which operated from 2016 until 2024. It included trip times, speed, hard braking, acceleration, and other driving behavior. Data brokers sold this information to insurance companies, which could use it to help determine premiums.Chevy Bolt owner Kenn Dahl told the New York Times he learned a data broker had a detailed record of his trips after his insurance costs jumped 21%.The investigation also found that many customers were enrolled without their knowledge. In some cases, dealership employees allegedly accepted terms and conditions on their behalf. Worse, GM's OnStar app incorrectly told more than 370,000 drivers they weren't enrolled in Smart Driver even while their information was being collected and sold.Getting paid twiceJust how lucrative was GM's data business? A separate lawsuit filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in August 2024 offers a detailed look at the financial arrangements behind it. Texas did not participate in the $220 million settlement.Under a 2015 agreement with Verisk Analytics, a company that supplies data and risk assessments to insurers, GM received an initial multimillion-dollar payment for its customers' driving information. Verisk then put that information into a database that insurance companies could pay to access.Every time insurers purchased licenses to the database, Verisk paid GM royalties based on the revenue generated. GM thus had a continuing financial interest in information collected from cars it had already sold.GM also required Verisk to approach other automakers, telecommunications companies, and third parties about contributing their information to the exchange. Verisk subsequently entered similar agreements with Honda in 2017 and Hyundai in 2018, according to the Texas lawsuit.The information wasn't anonymous. According to the filing, GM supplied Verisk with names, home addresses, vehicle identification numbers, and other identifying information that could be connected to individual driving records.Insurers could then look up a driver's score when deciding whether to issue coverage, renew a policy, or set premiums.A $70 million yearGM's arrangement with Verisk wasn't its only source of revenue from driving information.A 2018 deal with Wejo, a British connected-car company, put a dollar figure on a single year's worth of driving records. GM paid $25 million for a 35% ownership stake in Wejo and agreed to supply 2018 data from 2.6 million vehicles. The Texas filing values those records at $70 million.Wejo could license the information to businesses beyond the insurance industry, subject to GM's approval.The agreement described in the Texas lawsuit included a minimum monthly licensing revenue target of $3 million, with Wejo agreeing to pay GM 70% of that revenue. Wejo also agreed to reimburse GM if it failed to meet the target.The relationship continued until Wejo declared bankruptcy in May 2023.And GM wasn't limiting the information it supplied to driving behavior. Beginning in December 2022, GM also provided Wejo with radio-listening data, including ignition timestamps, AM/FM frequencies, station call signs, time zones, and radio genres.Think about that. Your driving habits were one thing. But even the radio stations you listened to could become part of a commercial data business.Beyond GMOther automakers are facing scrutiny over similar practices.In April 2026, Montana Attorney General Austin Knudsen opened an investigation into Ford and Stellantis over reports that the companies collected and sold or licensed vehicle data to third parties, including data brokers and insurers.The investigation is separate from the GM settlement, and the allegations against Ford and Stellantis have not been established as violations of the law. But the concern extends well beyond a single automaker or a discontinued OnStar program.Modern vehicles can collect enormous amounts of information about their owners. That information can be packaged, analyzed, licensed, and sold to businesses the driver may never have heard of.And if an insurance company uses that information to raise your rates, you could end up paying more because of data you never knowingly agreed to share.RELATED: Washington blocked Polestar. So why are Chinese-built robotaxis on American streets? Bloomberg/Getty ImagesWhere's the driver's cut?The GM settlement imposes new safeguards. The company must obtain affirmative consent before collecting or sharing driving and location information, limit its data collection, and strengthen oversight of dealership enrollment practices.But GM did not admit wrongdoing as part of the settlement, and Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel confirmed that the agreement provides no direct consumer restitution. A separate private class-action lawsuit seeking monetary relief remains pending.So the states receive millions, GM agrees to new rules, and drivers whose information may have affected their insurance premiums get nothing.That's a pretty convenient outcome for everyone except the consumer.Automakers need to explain what information they're collecting, who is buying it, and how much money changes hands. Insurance companies should disclose when driving information influences rates, and consumers deserve the ability to challenge inaccurate records before those records affect their wallets.If a company can make money from your driving habits, should you receive a share? And if your information was used to increase your insurance premium without your knowledge or consent, shouldn't you be entitled to a refund?Show me the money! ...Read More
...Read More
Republicans just got destroyed in the midterms, but President Trump doesn't seem particularly interested in admitting anything went wrong. Instead, he’s celebrating what he calls the “greatest two years in the history of the presidency.”BlazeTV hosts Dave Landau and Stu Burguiere are far from convinced.“The results were not good, and conservatives, Republicans, anyone who was not a socialist pretty much got smoked. With the exception of Florida, basically, everything went the wrong way,” Stu says.“Trump says in an interview he will accept the election results,” he continues, noting that “every single Democrat I’ve talked to for the last two years has told me he would not accept the results if he lost.”“And then he lost and he’s accepting the results,” he adds, before playing a clip of the president in a post-results interview on Fox News. “Congratulations to the Democrats. They did a good job. They’ve been looking for this one for 11 years, and they finally got it. But I don’t view it as a hit on me. I think we’ve had the greatest two years in the history of the presidency,” Trump said.However, Dave isn’t loving Trump’s response, comparing it to “saying when my dad was the sickest before he died, ‘I had the best two years with him.’”“One of the things I’ve wanted from the day that Donald Trump came down the escalator is for him to just be like, ‘Look, it’s not going well, and I screwed X, Y, and Z up, and here’s how we’re going to fix it.’ And he just never gets to that point,” Stu agrees.“I understand why he does it. He’s a big believer in the power of positive thinking. He believes he can will things into existence,” he adds.While Trump’s response wasn’t what Stu and Dave hoped for, Trump has had a “rough decade.”“There is something to be said of the Democrats for the constant impeachment going at him, the way that the media has conducted themselves when talking to him. It’s been a very rough decade,” Dave says.But the rough decade isn’t being made better by Trump’s actions, as Dave says he “did not arrest the people that should have been arrested,” journalist Nick Shirley has been “going around and figuring out fraud online before you have the people that should be discovering it,” and ICE is being “very performative."“But I mean, the way that everything was handled to actually fix the country, I think, has been pretty rough if I’m being honest,” he adds.Want more from Stu and Dave?To enjoy more of Stu and Dave's lethal blend of wit, humor, and insightful commentary subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream....Read More
...Read More